Archive for the 'Organizational Behaviour' Category

A social network for every company

I think it is inevitable that many companies will be investing in building their own online communities. In fact I think a company’s community becomes one of the main criteria for the business entity to be evaluated just like the cash flow, knowledge capital, and technology infrastructure.

More companies growing social networks

You might ask why an organization would want to have its own online community or social network? The answer is, because an online community of end-user and partners would provide a more cost effective and efficient way for the company to develop products or services, market them to the masses, and deliver related help and support with them too.

The Traditional Business School Way

all_gizah_pyramids.jpg

Let’s have a look: a company decides to develop a new product or service. They start with conducting market research. They send out surveys, organize focus groups, look at what the competition is doing. Sometimes that requires traveling around and going to hotels, trade shows, or seminars to gather intelligence data and stalk the competitors.

All of that cost money; lots of money! In fact sometimes only the very large corporations can afford such an elaborate market research.

Then they start making a list of features that this service or product ought to have. Basically they have to make lot of assumptions and often add everything under the sun to that list to make sure that the product appeals to the largest possible demographic out there. Let’s say they come up with a list of 20 features.

Then they go ahead and build it. Once the new product or service is out, and tested on focus groups (more cost), then it gets marketed using traditional methods: prints, media, online advertisement, an army of sales people which go around to stalk and harass potential buyers. ( more and more and more cost )

Now here is the big surprise! they find out that not all of those features are being adopted or liked by the end-users ( let’s say 5 out of 20 ) that means all the time and cost spent on developing the unpopular features was wasted. (more cost) so they have to push even harder to sell more of that product and or stalk more customers to generate enough sales and hopefully compensate the loss and make some profit. Large companies can use their monopoly and dominance over the market and make sure that end-users have no other option but to buy their product, however not all companies can do that.

In addition to that, this feature bloated product needs to be supported. They need call centers, 1-800 numbers, and people who can provide after-sales help and support (more cost). Not many companies can afford that either!

Continue reading ‘A social network for every company’

Popularity: 40% [?]

Clients who don’t get to update their own CMS powered websites!

In the last few weeks I got a few phone calls from people who had their sites build using some content management system (open source or secret source!) and they were asking me if they could gain access to the back-end of their own site and update some of the content. After some poking around and asking some questions we learned that their web designers are not providing their clients the administrative access and still continuing to charge for every little website update which could easily be done by the clients themselves.

Hey guys … that’s not a fair to your clients!

And to the smart website owners: if any web designer is doing that to you, I think you should honestly give them the boot and seek professional service somewhere else!

Continue reading ‘Clients who don’t get to update their own CMS powered websites!’

Popularity: 35% [?]

Not all programmers can develop software

Alright! here is a piece of information that I think every product, marketing, or human resource manager may want to keep in mind:

Every Software Developer can program, but not every Programmer can develop software.

Does it makes sense? here is another example:

JK Rowling can read and write English, but not every college graduate can write the next best selling Harry Potter book even though they both know how to read and write English.

I can get all fancy and discuss all the technical details that set software developers apart from programmers, but I think I communicated my point. To become a software developer one has to spend months and years to program in different languages, and they also learn how to treat code as building blocks to build more elaborate structures know as computer software or applications.

In smaller teams, software developers often design, plan and program their ideas themselves. In larger teams they may focus on the design and planning and hand over the implementation to the Programmers, although programming is often a joyful experience so software developers usually create some programming time for themselves too. Why do you think so many professional developers devote their time to open source projects around the world? because it is fun and exciting!

Normally, software developers are pricier than programmers. If your project is a web or desktop application you may want to consider it a good investment, or else you may end up with a product that seems to be working ( if you are lucky ) but suffers from poor architecture, performance issues or a phenomenon called the “Spaghetti Code!” or the “Dog’s Breakfast!” which makes it very hard to maintain.

You wouldn’t serve that kind of cuisine to your end-users, would you?

Related Articles:

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Popularity: 63% [?]

The Art of giving a power point presentation

The actual title is: Death By PowerPoint

This slide show is simply wonderful, it is marvelous!

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Popularity: 48% [?]

When corporate IT resists the Open Source

Larger companies are slowly introducing Open Source technologies to their organizations and, as most of us know, change even for better isn’t often very easy, specially if they had already invested in technologies such as Microsoft .NET and Windows Servers and subsequently hired staff who are only specialized in those technologies.

Many of the cutting edge Web2.0 innovations are happening in the open source world and they have been developed in technologies such as the LAMP stack (Linux, Apache, MySql, PHP) and Ruby on Rails. The problem is, when the management decides to utilize some of these technologies they immediately face the resistance from the internal IT team.

Reproducing many of the Web2.0 sales and marketing tools in the proprietary world is very costly and expensive and the results are often not so impressive either. In fact I see many smaller companies who are utilizing more advanced web applications with slick user interfaces to power their blogs, content management driven websites, online forums, and Intranets, all thanks to the open source technologies. On the other hand, some larger sales and marketing companies with much larger budgets are starting to feel deprived from the new wave of internet applications, because utilizing one means exposing the internal IT staff to things they aren’t used to see!

Continue reading ‘When corporate IT resists the Open Source’

Popularity: 51% [?]


View Rastin Mehr's profile on LinkedIn
rmd Studio Inc.
www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Aristocrat. Make your own badge here.
Rastin Mehr's Facebook profile

Close
E-mail It